Honduras Defends Its Democracy. So states an article appearing in today's Wall Street Journal on page A11.
In case you missed it, there was a coup in Honduras over the weekend. Their former president, Mel Zelaya, had been acting as though the rule of law doesn't apply to him. He wanted to rewrite the constitution to give him more power like Chávez did in Venezuela. According to the article:
Yesterday the Central American country was being pressured to restore the authoritarian Mr. Zelaya by the likes of Fidel Castro, Daniel Ortega, Hillary Clinton and, of course, Hugo himself. The Organization of American States, having ignored Mr. Zelaya's abuses, also wants him back in power. It will be a miracle if Honduran patriots can hold their ground.
That Mr. Zelaya acted as if he were above the law, there is no doubt. While Honduran law allows for a constitutional rewrite, the power to open that door does not lie with the president. A constituent assembly can only be called through a national referendum approved by its Congress.
But Mr. Zelaya declared the vote on his own and had Mr. Chávez ship him the necessary ballots from Venezuela. The Supreme Court ruled his referendum unconstitutional, and it instructed the military not to carry out the logistics of the vote as it normally would do.
The top military commander, Gen. Romeo Vásquez Velásquez, told the president that he would have to comply. Mr. Zelaya promptly fired him. The Supreme Court ordered him reinstated. Mr. Zelaya refused.
Calculating that some critical mass of Hondurans would take his side, the president decided he would run the referendum himself. So on Thursday he led a mob that broke into the military installation where the ballots from Venezuela were being stored and then had his supporters distribute them in defiance of the Supreme Court's order.
The attorney general had already made clear that the referendum was illegal, and he further announced that he would prosecute anyone involved in carrying it out. Yesterday, Mr. Zelaya was arrested by the military and is now in exile in Costa Rica.
It remains to be seen what Mr. Zelaya's next move will be. It's not surprising that chavistas throughout the region are claiming that he was victim of a military coup. They want to hide the fact that the military was acting on a court order to defend the rule of law and the constitution, and that the Congress asserted itself for that purpose, too.
Honduras is fighting back by strictly following the constitution. The Honduran Congress met in emergency session yesterday and designated its president as the interim executive as stipulated in Honduran law. It also said that presidential elections set for November will go forward. The Supreme Court later said that the military acted on its orders. It also said that when Mr. Zelaya realized that he was going to be prosecuted for his illegal behavior, he agreed to an offer to resign in exchange for safe passage out of the country. Mr. Zelaya denies it.
It is quite telling that Clinton is siding with Castro, Ortega and Chávez rather than the rule of law. She has little to no respect for the U.S. Constitution so it's not surprising she fails to respect the Honduran Constitution. The WSJ article states that by
failing to come to the aid of checks and balances Mrs. Clinton has shown her true colors.
Mr. Obama
weighed in as well against the Honduran Constitution:
I call on all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Any existing tensions and disputes must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference.
Any existing tensions and disputes must be resolved peacefully through dialogue free from any outside interference? Yet our military is still in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sounds a lot like non-peaceful
outside interference being injected into
existing tensions and disputes.
I mention that only because it reeks of hypocrisy. I support our military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. I wish we would let the military be the military and completely destroy the enemy. However, our politicians and many of our people don't have the stomach for that sort of fighting. They like a sterile environment. Sorry. War is not nice and tidy.
How about the rule of law in the United States? Our president has no regard for it. Nor have several of his previous predecessors. Congress disdains the Constitution as well. The courts have in many cases elevated themselves above the Constitution. What are we to do?
Being a relatively young guy, I have (naively?) thought for years that voting might bring about the change necessary to return us to a constitutional republic.
We the People of the United States, at least the freedom loving among us, find ourselves in quite a pickle. We are outnumbered by those who prefer "security" as provided by the government over personal responsibility. Take the healthcare "debate" for example. There is little actual debate taking place. It's no longer a question of
IF we should have socialized medicine but what brand of socialized medicine we will end up with. Many people don't even bark at the idea of losing freedom over their own healthcare.
With so many people like that in our country, how do we win elections? Even then, given the proclivity of politicians to trample on the Constitution, we would have to vote out of office about 50% in a given election cycle to effect change. That assumes that all of the newly elected politicians would actually respect the rule of law.
An armed uprising by
the people would be futile. Without the support of the military any group of armed citizens would be squashed like ants. I've seen enough episodes of
Ultimate Weapons on the Military Channel to know the people would not have a chance.
The only hope for the survival of a free United States is for God to change the hearts of a great majority of our people.
Short of that, I think the United States is doomed.
I have found the recent events in the United States, beginning with Bush's bailout plan, to be most depressing. Truthfully, it probably goes much farther back. As I enjoy joking with my family,
I have Libertarian tendencies. Government intrusion really bothers me, especially since I live in what purports to be a free country.
The comforts I enjoy in the United States distract me from my final home. Christian, I am writing to myself,
our citizenship is in heaven (Philippians 3:20 ESV).
The earth is not my home.
These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city. (Hebrews 11:13-16 ESV)